ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Ultrasound-Based Tomographic Imaging Reconstruction and Synthesis Methods: a Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) imaging is valued for its safety, affordability, and accessibility, but its low spatial resolution and operator dependence limit its diagnostic capabilities. Tomographic imaging modalities like computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offer high-resolution 3D visualization but are cost-prohibitive and complex. Ultrasound-based tomographic imaging aims to combine the advantages of both modalities, potentially democratizing access to advanced imaging. A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-SR guidelines. Articles were identified through searches in PubMed MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and arXiv from inception to July 2025. Eligibility criteria included full-text original studies focused on ultrasound-based tomographic imaging generation or reconstruction methods. Out of 8256 identified articles, 86 met the inclusion criteria. Studies examined four imaging modalities: photoacoustic tomography (36%), ultrasound computed tomography (36%), 3D reconstruction (20%), and synthetic imaging (7%). Deep learning algorithms (67%) were the most common, followed by iterative reconstruction algorithms (9%), and other methods. The breast (17%), brain (16%), and blood vessels (14%) were the most studied anatomical regions. This review highlights advancements in ultrasound-based tomographic imaging, driven by deep learning innovations. Despite progress, the field is still in its infancy, and challenges remain in clinical adoption, particularly in standardization and validating performance. Future research should focus on improving algorithm efficiency, generalizability, and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.