ReviewNanomedicine (London, England)2025
Treating venous malformations with nanomedicines.
Review in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Venous malformations (VMs) are congenital vascular anomalies that cause pain, bleeding, and functional impairment, yet current first-line therapies such as sclerotherapy and surgical resection are limited by complications and high recurrence rates. Nanomedicine provides a promising alternative by exploiting the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR)-like effect to achieve selective accumulation of nanoparticles (NPs) within VMs. Preclinical studies support the use of NPs not only for improved drug delivery but also for non-pharmacologic based treatment, such as photothermal therapy. Furthermore, active targeting strategies involving surface-functionalized NPs offer the potential for enhanced specificity and treatment efficacy. Despite these advances, clinical translation faces challenges such as heterogeneity in EPR efficiency, depth-limited delivery, and pediatric safety concerns. Continued efforts to create more effective, pediatric-specific drug delivery systems are essential for developing safer, more efficient, and minimally invasive nanomedicine therapy for patients with VMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.