Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41087814›Full record

ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2026

From Muscle Fibers to Functional Foods: Bridging Conventional and Cultivated Approaches.

Martin Krøyer Rasmussen, Rebekka Rinder Thøgersen, Jette Feveile Young, Margrethe Therkildsen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin Krøyer RasmussenDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Martink.rasmussen@food.au.dk.
Rebekka Rinder ThøgersenDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jette Feveile YoungDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Margrethe TherkildsenDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter explores the quality attributes of cultivated meat, drawing parallels and distinctions with conventional meat to support future product development. It examines key technical, sensory, and nutritional parameters, like texture, water-holding capacity, color, flavor, and nutritional composition. The chapter highlights how cultivated meat's quality is shaped by cellular composition, scaffold materials, and postharvest processes and how these factors influence consumer-relevant traits such as tenderness, juiciness, and taste. It also discusses the potential of cultivated meat to match or surpass conventional meat in nutritional value, including protein content, amino acid profile, and micronutrient composition. Contributions from five cultivated meat companies provide an industrial context.

Indexed as

Functional FoodMeatMuscle Fibers, SkeletalAmino AcidsAnimalsHumansIn Vitro MeatMeat SubstitutesNutritive ValueAmino AcidsAmino acidsDIAASFlavorMeat qualityMuscle cellProteinTexture

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.