Evidence mapPaperPMID 41089657Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems biology2025

GETgene-AI: a framework for prioritizing actionable cancer drug targets.

Adrian Gu, Jake Y Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adrian GuAlphaMind Club, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Jake Y ChenAlphaMind Club, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Funding

CONNECT: Collaborative Network for Nurturing Ecosystems of Common Fund Team ScienceU54OD036472 · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · 2025 to 2025
$1.9M
NIH HHS U54 OD036472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prioritizing actionable drug targets is a critical challenge in cancer research, where high-dimensional genomic data and the complexity of tumor biology often hinder effective prioritization. To address this, we developed GETgene-AI, a novel computational framework that integrates network-based prioritization, machine learning, and automated literature analysis to prioritize and rank potential therapeutic targets. Central to GETgene-AI is the G.E.T. strategy, which combines three data streams: mutational frequency (G List), differential expression (E List), and known drug targets (T List). These components are iteratively refined and ranked using the Biological Entity Expansion and Ranking Engine (BEERE), leveraging protein-protein interaction networks, functional annotations, and experimental evidence. Additionally, GETgene-AI incorporates GPT-4o, an advanced large language model, to automate literature-based ranking, reducing manual curation and increasing efficiency. In this study, we applied GETgene-AI to pancreatic cancer as a case study. The framework successfully prioritized high-priority targets such as PIK3CA and PRKCA, validated through experimental evidence and clinical relevance. Benchmarking against GEO2R and STRING demonstrated GETgene-AI's superior performance, achieving higher precision, recall, and efficiency in prioritizing actionable targets. Moreover, the framework mitigated false positives by deprioritizing genes lacking functional or clinical significance. While demonstrated on pancreatic cancer, the modular design of GETgene-AI enables scalability across diverse cancers and diseases. By integrating multi-omics datasets with advanced computational and AI-driven approaches, GETgene-AI provides a versatile and robust platform for accelerating cancer drug discovery. This framework bridges computational innovations with translational research to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

cancercomputational biology and bioinformaticsdrug targetdrug target prioritizationgene prioritarizationnetwork-based prioritizationnetwork biologypancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID41089657
PMCPMC12515665

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.