ReviewVisceral medicine2025
Prediction of Pancreatic Cancer Risk in Patients with New-Onset Diabetes.
Review in Visceral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regional Trends and Forecasts of Pancreatic Cancer Incidence in Poland: A Voivodeship-Level Analysis of Risk Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the USA despite its lower incidence, primarily due to late-stage diagnosis. While early detection could double survival rates, screening the general population is not cost-effective due to low disease prevalence and technical limitations. Summary: This review examines the relationship between diabetes and pancreatic cancer, highlighting how diabetes types differently impact cancer risk. New-onset diabetes triples pancreatic cancer risk compared to the general population, while long-standing diabetes doubles it. Several prediction models have been developed to identify high-risk individuals among new-onset diabetes patients, with recent models achieving AUCs up to 0.91. Current biomarkers like CA 19-9 show improved utility when combined with other clinical parameters, though they remain inadequate for general population screening. Cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that screening becomes viable when 3-year cancer incidence exceeds 2% and 25% of cases are detected at a localized stage. Key Messages: (1) New-onset diabetes presents a stronger risk factor for pancreatic cancer than long-standing diabetes. (2) Multiple prediction models show promise but face challenges with missing data and cross-population validation. (3) Integrated approaches combining clinical parameters, biomarkers, and machine learning offer the most promising path forward for early detection. (4) Current detection rates fall below cost-effectiveness thresholds, highlighting the need for improved screening strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.