ArticleImmunity, inflammation and disease2025
Predictive Value of Combined CRP and INR for Intracranial Hypertension in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis.
Article in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is bilateral laminectomy and fusion superior to total laminectomy and fusion in two-level lumbar spinal stenosis?Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of Combined CRP and INR for Intracranial Hypertension in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntracranial hypertension (IH) is a frequently observed clinical manifestation of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), which reflects the severity of the disease. The gold standard of intracranial pressure (ICP) is through invasive lumbar puncture.
objectivesWe aimed to develop a noninvasive model combining biomarkers and clinical features to predict IH in CVT patients, facilitating early risk stratification.
methodsThe patients with CVT were consecutively enrolled in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January 2011 and June 2024, which were divided into two groups: CVT-IH group and CVT + IH group based on ICP levels. Additionally, participants were further categorized into four groups according to the cut-off of C-reactive protein (CRP) and international normalized ratio (INR) by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Logistic regression models were employed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of IH across the four subgroups.
results157 individuals were finally included, 61 of whom had IH. Participants with CRP > 5.5 g/L or INR < 0.99 were more likely to experience IH. Those with high CRP and low INR conferred 9.778 times higher risk of IH compared with that of those with low CRP and high INR. Simultaneously adding CRP and INR to the basic model with established risk factors significantly improved risk discrimination and reclassification for IH of CVT patients.
conclusionsCombination of CRP and INR better predicted the occurrence of IH for CVT patients, which might provide a noninvasive way of assessing ICP of CVT patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.