Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41090491›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025

Real-world outcomes after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Hanna Rahbek Mortensen, Lone Hoffmann, Marianne Nordsmark, Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Ditte Sloth Møller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanna Rahbek MortensenDanish Center of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. hanna.mortensen@auh.rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-5759-5349
Lone HoffmannDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3575-0421
Marianne NordsmarkDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8167-1273
Lise Bech Jellesmark ThorsenDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4533-1642
Ditte Sloth MøllerDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9910-515X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeStandard treatment for esophageal (EC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer includes neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT), followed by surgery or definitive chemo-radiotherapy (dCRT) for inoperable patients. This study assessed real-world survival and morbidity in EC patients treated with radiotherapy (RT). Patient/material and methods: In this retrospective study, 417 patients with EC or GEJ cancer received nCRT or dCRT between 2012 and 2021 at a single center. We evaluated overall survival (OS), loco-regional control, progression-free survival, failure patterns, and toxicity. Data were sourced from clinical and treatment records. Patients were treated following national guidelines and received intensity-modulated radiotherapy and daily cone-beam Computed Tomography (CT) for setup. Radiotherapy doses were 41.4-66 Gy in 23-33 fractions.

resultsOf the patients, 250 received nCRT, and 167 received dCRT. Most (86%) had T3-T4 tumors, and 65% had node-positive disease. Histologies were adenocarcinoma (50%) and squamous cell carcinoma (45%). A total of 88% completed RT, and 92.4% of nCRT patients proceeded to surgery. Median OS was 31 months for nCRT and 24 months for dCRT; 3-year OS was 46% and 38%, respectively. Disease recurrence occurred in 46% with a median interval of 20 months. Multivariable analysis identified OS-associated factors for both nCRT and dCRT. Acute toxicity was common but generally mild; late side effects were not systematically recorded.

interpretationIn clinical practice, OS after nCRT or dCRT was as expected. Most patients undergoing nCRT proceeded to surgery. Toxicity was frequent but manageable.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41090491
PMCPMC12534993

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.