Evidence mapPaperPMID 41090739Full record

ReviewCells2025

Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: Molecular Insights, Forensic Perspectives, and Therapeutic Horizons.

Maria Sofia Fede, Gloria Daziani, Francesco Tavoletta, Angelo Montana, Paolo Compagnucci, Gaia Goteri, Margherita Neri, Francesco Paolo Busardò

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Association ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Sofia FedeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Legal Medicine, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-4286-1788
Gloria DazianiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Legal Medicine, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Francesco TavolettaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Legal Medicine, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-6452-5880
Angelo MontanaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Legal Medicine, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0508-6523
Paolo CompagnucciCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Marche University Hospital, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1924-6548
Gaia GoteriInstitute of Pathologic Anatomy and Histopathology, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Margherita NeriSection of Forensic Pathology, Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine Department, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6459-1669
Francesco Paolo BusardòDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Legal Medicine, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains the leading cause of death worldwide, with myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MIRI) emerging as a significant factor influencing patient outcomes despite timely reperfusion therapy. MIRI refers to paradoxical myocardial damage that occurs upon restoration of coronary blood flow and is driven by complex inflammatory, oxidative, and metabolic mechanisms, which can exacerbate infarct size (IS), contributing to adverse outcomes. This review explores the molecular and cellular pathophysiology of MIRI, emphasizing both its clinical and forensic relevance. The principal mechanisms discussed include oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, calcium overload and ion homeostasis imbalance, inflammatory responses, with particular focus on the NLRP3 inflammasome and cytokine pathways, and multiple forms of cell death (apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and autophagy). Additionally, the authors present original immunohistochemical findings from autopsy cases of patients who suffered ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but subsequently died. These findings underscore that successful reperfusion does not completely prevent delayed complications, like arrhythmias, ventricular fibrillation (VF), and sudden cardiac death (SCD), often caused by secondary MIRI-related mechanisms. Moreover, the case series highlight the diagnostic value of inflammatory markers for pathologists in identifying MIRI as a contributing factor in such fatalities. Finally, immunotherapeutic strategies-including IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors such as Canakinumab and Tocilizumab-are reviewed for their potential to reduce cardiovascular events and mitigate the effects of MIRI. The review advocates for continued multidisciplinary research aimed at improving our understanding of MIRI, developing effective treatments, and informing forensic investigations of reperfusion-related deaths.

Indexed as

Myocardial Reperfusion InjuryAnimalsHumanscardiac inflammationcardiac oxidative stresscardioprotective therapiescytokinesforensic cardiopathologymyocardial ischemia reperfusion injurymyocardial revascularizationpercutaneous cardiac intervention

Identifiers

PMID41090739
PMCPMC12523495

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.