ArticleCancer research communications2025
Molecular Characterization of Oncogenic Gene Fusions in a Large Real-World Cohort of Solid Tumors.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene fusions are a class of important oncogenic drivers, with many matched FDA-approved targeted therapies across multiple solid tumors. However, the prevalence of fusions varies considerably by cancer type and assay. Fusion detection is technically challenging, and studies have shown that RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) can improve fusion detection rates when used in conjunction with DNA-based NGS. In this study, we performed a retrospective pan-cancer analysis of 67,278 patients receiving both RNA- and DNA-NGS in 43 distinct solid-tumor cancer types, including non-small cell lung cancer (18.6%), colorectal cancer (18.2%), and breast cancer (13.1%). In this cohort, 1,497 patients (2.2%) had at least one of nine fusions detected-each having an FDA-approved matched therapy in at least one indication. A total of 316 patients (21.1%) had a fusion detected (RET or NTRK1/2/3) with matched targeted therapy approved in all cancer indications. Concurrent RNA- and DNA-NGS increased the detection of driver gene fusions by 21% compared with DNA-NGS alone. Gene fusions were observed in a range of cancers beyond their approved cancer indications: of 1,501 fusions detected, 29% (n = 437) were detected outside of an FDA-approved indication. Finally, emerging fusion drivers with targets in drug development were found in an additional 218 patients, with combined RNA- and DNA-NGS increasing detection of these variants by 127%. Our findings support combined RNA-NGS and DNA-NGS to maximize detection of clinically actionable fusions with FDA-approved matched therapies and potentially actionable fusions in non-FDA-approved indications or those matched to therapies in clinical development. SIGNIFICANCE: This large, real-world pan-cancer study demonstrates that concurrent RNA- and DNA-based NGS significantly improves the detection of clinically actionable gene fusions compared with DNA-NGS alone. Our findings highlight the critical value of integrating RNA-NGS into routine molecular profiling to optimize the detection of driver gene fusions. Doing so may expand the population of patients eligible for matched targeted therapies or clinical trials, particularly in cancers with limited treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.