ArticleFuture science OA2025
Multicenter retrospective analysis of success and failure patterns in groin flap reconstruction for upper extremity soft tissue defects.
Article in Future science OA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aims to analyze the success and failure patterns of groin flap procedures performed across multiple healthcare centers in Jordan. PATIENTS &
methodsA multicenter retrospective case series was conducted involving patients who underwent groin flap reconstruction for upper extremity soft tissue defects between 2015 and 2024 in Jordan. All cases where the groin flap was used as the primary reconstructive method with at least six months of follow-up were included. Variables analyzed included patient demographics, defect characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess flap viability over time.
resultsA total of 89 patients were included, with a flap survival rate of 94.6%. Partial flap necrosis occurred in 5.4% of cases. The 12-month flap survival was 98.9% (95% CI: 96.7%-100%), while 36- and 60-month survival rates were both 94.4% (95% CI: 89.1%-99.9%). Failed flaps were associated with factors such as smoking, diabetes, and prolonged defect ischemia.
conclusionsGroin flaps remain a reliable reconstructive option in upper limb injuries, particularly in settings with limited microsurgical resources. This study highlights key predictors of failure and supports the continued role of the groin flap in selected patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.