ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Visuomotor Control Accuracy of Circular Tracking Movement According to Visual Information in Virtual Space.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The VR-based circular tracking movement evaluation system (CES) was developed to quantitatively assess visuomotor control. The virtual stick, a component of the CES, provides visual cues in the virtual environment and haptic feedback when holding the controller. This study examined the effects of stick presence and presentation order on control accuracy for distance, angle, and angular velocity. Twenty-seven participants (12 females; mean age 23.3 ± 2.3 years) performed tasks in the frontal plane followed by the sagittal plane. In each plane, the stick was visible for the first 1-3 revolutions and invisible for the subsequent 4-6 revolutions in the invisible condition, with the reverse order in the visible condition. In the invisible condition, control accuracy with the stick was 1.10 times higher for distance only in the sagittal plane, and 1.13 and 1.09 times higher for angle and angular velocity in the frontal plane, and 1.11 and 1.08 times higher in the sagittal plane. No significant differences were observed in the visible condition. The improved control accuracy when the stick was visible is likely due to enhanced precision in constructing the reference frame, internal models, body coordinates, and effective multisensory integration of visual and haptic information. Such visual information may enable fine control in virtual environment-based applications, including games and surgical simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.