ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
The Biomarker Profile of Alzheimer's Disease for Disease-Modifying Treatment Eligibility: Questions and Debates.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel cell markers with altered expression in brain aging and Alzheimer's disease: A review.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Neurodegenerative Disease: From Molecular Basis to Therapy, 3rd Edition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of cognitive decline; currently, anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies are available for clinical use as disease-modifying treatments, while many other substances are being tested in clinical trials. Molecular biomarkers for AD have been studied for more than two decades, and various guidelines and diagnostic recommendations have been published. However, there are still questions and controversies about the biomarker profile needed to confirm AD and the eligibility for such established treatments and clinical trials. Is amyloid positivity sufficient for eligibility, or is a biomarker for tau biochemistry/pathology also needed? What is the role of hybrid ratios combining amyloid and tau? Should we rely on plasma biomarkers alone? This review aimed to describe and discuss such questions and controversies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.