Contemporary Trends and Predictors of pT0 in Radical Cystectomy Specimens Among Non-Muscle and Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis from a Single Tertiary Centre in the United Kingdom.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Beyond the BCG Paradox: Biological Rationale and Clinical Evidence for Combining Intravesical BCG with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in High-Risk Non-muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Oncology and therapy · 2026
   Review
2. Survival Outcomes of BCG Only, BCG Plus EMDA-MMC or Upfront Radical Cystectomy in High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancers (NMIBCs): A Multicentre, International, Collaborative Study from Tertiary Referral Institutions.Cancers · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as