ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Inactive but awake behaviour as indicating a depression-like state in mice: aetiological factors and association with adult hippocampal neurogenesis.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inactive but awake behaviour as indicating a depression-like state in mice: aetiological factors and association with adult hippocampal neurogenesis.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In laboratory mice, 'inactive but awake' (IBA) home-cage behaviour involves animals being spontaneously motionless with eyes open, not interacting with their surroundings. Conventional (barren) housing typically triggers IBA more than comparatively enriched environments. Compellingly greater IBA is associated with some depression-like features in mice and we further explored this through three aims. First, we aimed to replicate previous results highlighting environmental and genetic (using two strains of mice: DBA/2J and C57BL/6J) aetiological contributors to IBA. Second, we explored whether the performance of IBA varied as the level of enrichment was either increased or reduced. Third, we opportunistically investigated whether elevated IBA predicted lower density of immature neurons in the dorsal (dDG) or ventral dentate gyrus (vDG) of the hippocampus. As expected, mice housed in conventional cages displayed more IBA than those in comparatively enriched cages and even more so in DBA/2J mice. As predicted, enrichment loss generally increased IBA while enrichment gain decreased IBA. Unsurprisingly, immature neuron density was lower in conventional compared with enriched cages, although only for vDG. Elevated IBA predicted reduced immature neuron density in the dDG, and this effect tended to be stronger for C57BL/6Js. We discuss the result implications, study limitations and future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.