ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Research priorities in vulvodynia: A modified Delphi study.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychosocial Resources and Emotional Support Needs in Women with Vulvodynia: A Lifespan Developmental and Biopsychosocial Perspective.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVulvodynia is a chronic, unexplained pain in and around the vulva, likely involving an interplay of biological and psychosocial factors. Women with vulvodynia often experience delayed diagnoses, ineffective treatments, and significant quality of life impacts, compounded by social stigma and negative healthcare experiences. Despite its prevalence, our understanding of vulvodynia and its impacts remains limited.
objectivesTo establish research priorities that address critical knowledge deficits and improve outcomes for individuals affected by vulvodynia.
designA mixed-methods participatory study using a modified electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) approach combined with focus groups.
methodsA three-phase modified e-Delphi process was combined with focus groups to gather insights from patients, clinicians, and researchers with expertise in vulvodynia. In Phase 1, participants generated research topics through surveys and focus group discussions. In Phase 2, these topics were rated and ranked by participants to generate a preliminary "top 10" list of priorities. In Phase 3, participants re-rated and re-ranked the preliminary list to achieve consensus on the final research priorities.
resultsThe top three priorities identified were: (1) Creating a person-centred care pathway and increasing awareness, education, and training of clinicians on vulvodynia, (2) Development of multidisciplinary pain teams, and (3) Creating accessible information for patients on treatment options and self-care advice.
conclusionThis study highlights the importance of integrating the perspectives of those with lived experience, healthcare professionals, and researchers to identify research priorities with the greatest potential for impact. Findings provide a roadmap for future vulvodynia research, support efficient resource allocation, and inform policy development. Furthermore, these results provide a foundation for grassroots initiatives to improve awareness, education, and care for individuals affected by vulvodynia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.