ArticlePloS one2025
Development and validation of a nomogram for all-cause mortality in osteoporosis patients over five years.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOsteoporosis significantly increases fracture risk and mortality, yet robust tools for predicting long-term mortality in this population are lacking.This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting 5-year all-cause mortality among patients with osteoporosis.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 2,165 osteoporosis patients sourced from the NHANES database (2007-2023; training set) and 304 patients from Dandong Central Hospital (2017-2024; validation set). Potential risk factors were analyzed through LASSO regression, followed by multivariate logistic regression, to identify independent predictors.A nomogram was constructed employing significant predictors. Finally, the C-index, ROC curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis were utilized to validate the model in both the training and validation sets.
resultsIn the study population, 192 patients died in the training set and 36 patients died in the experimental set. At the same time, we collected detailed baseline demographic data. Specifically, the age distribution of the training set was 56.07 ± 17.62, and that of the experimental set was 57.11 ± 18.34. Among them, 49.52% of the training set were male, and 50.99% of the experimental set were male. During the study period, we recorded 228 deaths. Seven independent predictors of 5-year all-cause mortality were identified: increased Age (OR=1.090,95%Cl: 1.115-2.313), Male gender (OR=1.606,95%Cl: 1.071-1.109), Smoking (OR=1.945,95%Cl: 1.289-2.933), higher FBG (OR=1.006,95%Cl: 1.002-1.010), higher Uric acid (OR=1.177,95%Cl: 1.039-1.332); Alcohol use (OR=0.583,95%Cl: 0.410-0.827) and higher BMI (OR=0.946,95%Cl: 0.909-0.985) were protective. The resulting nomogram demonstrated strong discriminatory ability in both the training set (AUC = 0.834) and validation set (AUC = 0.862). In the validation set, the precision rate was 0.514, the recall rate was 0.5, and the F1-score was 0.507. Calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes (p > 0.05). Decision curve analysis confirmed significant clinical utility across a wide range of risk thresholds.
conclusionThis study developed and validated a novel nomogram incorporating seven common clinical factors, which can predict the 5-year all-cause mortality risk in patients with osteoporosis. Although the tool demonstrated good performance and has the potential to assist in clinical risk stratification and personalized management, there are still some limitations in the study design. Therefore, its clinical applicability should be interpreted with caution until further external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.