ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Contextual constraints and dilemmas influencing health providers' prescription practices in a conflict-affected area: Qualitative insights from Mopti, Mali.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Availability of essential medicines in conflict-affected african regions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Conflict and health · 2026Review
- Challenges and best practices in essential medicines supply and use in internally displaced persons (IDP) camps: A qualitative study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Armed conflicts present complex, multidimensional challenges that severely compromise both access to and the quality of healthcare, including the adequate prescription of essential medicines. This study aimed to identify and understand the factors underlying the irrational prescribing of medicine in areas affected by armed conflict in the Mopti region in Mali. An exploratory qualitative study was conducted using a semi-structured interview guide to collect data from 30 participants, including health professionals from three health districts, representatives of the regional health directorate, members of community health associations, and staff from non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working in health sector. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and subjected to thematic content analysis, using NVIVO 14 (2023 version) to support coding and data retrieval. Study participants reported a range of health system- and patient-related factors contributing to irrational prescribing practices in these conflict-affected areas. Health systems factors included: an imbalance between workload and the availability of qualified staff; limited access to professional training and training resources; poor adherence to prescription guidelines and procedures -often a consequence of contextual constraints; and coercion from armed terrorist groups. Administrative and political challenges were also highlighted, including weak monitoring and supervision mechanisms within the local health system; a lack of oversight by health and regulatory authorities in blockaded areas; the development of an informal pharmaceutical sector to compensate for deficiencies in the formal system; and overprescription of medicines linked to insurance schemes. Patient-related factors included delayed care-seeking linked to regional insecurity and contributing to increased morbidity and worsened health outcomes. Our results show that the multiple contextual factors influencing prescribing of medicines are deeply inter-linked. Efforts to improve the quality of prescribing in conflict zones must recognise that practices often deemed 'irrational' are shaped by complex contextual constraints. A coordinated and comprehensive approach involving all health systems stakeholders is required.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.