Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41100853›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

Clinical Information Extraction From Notes of Veterans With Lymphoid Malignancies: Natural Language Processing Study.

Lu He, Matthew R Moldenhauer, Kai Zheng, Helen Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lu HeZilber College of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0181-018X
Matthew R MoldenhauerSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6596-6231
Kai ZhengDepartment of Informatics, Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-4948
Helen MaVeterans Affairs Health System, 5901 E 7th Street, Long Beach, CA, 90822, United States, 1 5628268000.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0416-5115

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI RICHARD A. VAN ETTEN · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Institute for Clinical and Translational ScienceUM1TR004927 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI DAN M COOPER, Eric J. Vilain · 2024 to 2026
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004927NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical natural language processing (cNLP) techniques are commonly developed and used to extract information from clinical notes to facilitate clinical decision-making and research. However, they are less established for rare diseases such as lymphoid malignancies due to the lack of annotated data as well as the heterogeneity and complexity of how clinical information is documented. In addition, there is increasing evidence that cNLP techniques may be prone to biases embedded in clinical documentation or model development. These biases can result in disparities in performance when extracting clinical information or predicting patient outcomes. Objective: This study aims to report the development and validation of a cNLP pipeline that extracts clinical information such as performance status, staging, and diagnosis, as well as less common information such as substance use and military environmental exposures, from the clinical notes of veterans with lymphoid malignancies. Methods: We developed a rule-based cNLP pipeline that integrates domain expertise. We tested and compared the performance of the cNLP pipeline on notes from 2 veteran patient cohorts: one from non-Hispanic White veterans and the other from non-Hispanic Black veterans. Results: Overall, our pipeline achieved promising performance on our study data, especially for extracting entities that have standard clinical documentation, such as performance status. We also found that while the pipeline has robust performance across the two patient groups, the false-positive and false-negative rates were significantly associated with race for detecting the primary diagnosis (P=.001 for both); the false-negative rate was significantly associated with race for identifying substance use (P=.02). Conclusions: The system exhibits satisfying and comparable performance for most clinical entities of interest except for (1) the primary diagnosis and (2) substance use. Future work will address the challenges encountered in developing and deploying the cNLP pipeline on the Department of Veterans Affairs data for rare cancers and enhance the performance of cNLP systems to avoid biases.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsInformation Storage and RetrievalLymphomaNatural Language ProcessingVeteransFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Statesclinical documentationclinical informaticsclinical information extractiondevelopinglymphoid malignanciesnatural language processingNLPnon-Hispanic Blacknon-Hispanic Whiterare cancervalidatingveterans

Identifiers

PMID41100853
PMCPMC12530692

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.