ArticleJournal of sport and health science2025
Grandmaternal exercise improves the metabolic health of second-generation offspring generated from F1 females.
Article in Journal of sport and health science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The metabolic implications of maternal exercise: effects on pregnant women and their offspring.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- The biochemical and metabolic adaptations underpinning the health benefits of exercise.Journal of sport and health science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMaternal obesity during pregnancy can lead to increased risk for metabolic disease in offspring during adulthood, helping fuel the worldwide increase in obesity. Fortunately, studies in rodent models have established that female dams (F0) that perform voluntary wheel running exercise during pregnancy have first-generation (F1) offspring with improved glucose tolerance, suggesting a potential means to reduce the burden of generational metabolic disease transmission. We have shown that maternal exercise also affects F1 male offspring as sires, as their progeny (F2) have similarly improved metabolic health. Whether maternal exercise can affect F1 females in a manner that improves F2 offspring metabolism is not known. Here, we determined whether voluntary exercise by F0 grandmothers, via their F1 female progeny, produced F2 male and female offspring with an improved metabolic phenotype.
methodsSix-week-old C57BL/6 N female mice (F0) were fed a chow diet and either kept sedentary or exercise trained by voluntary wheel running for 2 weeks preconception and during pregnancy. Chow-fed sedentary F1 female offspring at 8 weeks of age were bred with age-matched untreated virgin males to generate F2 offspring. F2 were kept sedentary and chow fed and studied up to 52 weeks of age. Metabolic parameters were assessed, including food intake, body weight, body composition, glucose tolerance, systemic glucose and insulin levels, and liver metabolism.
resultsGrandmaternal exercise did not significantly alter male and female F2 offspring body weights measured throughout the first year of life, nor was there an effect of grandmaternal exercise on F2 offspring fat mass or lean mass. Remarkably, despite the lack of effect on body weight parameters, grandmaternal exercise resulted in improved glucose tolerance and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in F2 offspring at 52 weeks of age, effects that were more pronounced in male F2 offspring.
conclusionVoluntary wheel running exercise in female mice during pregnancy leads to metabolic improvements in her grand offspring, despite no direct intervention of the intermediate maternal generation. Maternal physical activity during pregnancy may reduce metabolic diseases in later generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.