ArticleScientific reports2025
Functional personalized complex combination nano therapy for osteosarcoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Molecular Insights and Computational Modeling of Multiple Myeloma and Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle-based mechanistic and multifunctional strategies for targeted osteosarcoma therapy.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-Enabled Modulation of Tumor-Associated Macrophages and Dendritic Cells to Enhance Cancer Immunotherapy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteosarcoma (OS) remains a challenging malignancy, particularly for metastatic cases, due to its heterogeneous genetic landscape characterized by lack of actionable oncogenic drivers and thus lack of personalized therapy. Though personalization of therapy based on functional assays using patient derived cells is emerging as a promising approach, it was not explored as a workflow for identifying patient specific drug cocktails. In this study we investigated a sequential drug screening approach for single and pair drugs which can be rationally used to identify 4 drug cocktails. We started with a systematic screening of 17 drugs from multiple classes across four osteosarcoma cell lines (U2OS, MG-63, SaOS-2, and K7M2), and observed differential drug responses among the cell lines. Interestingly, leading large language models (LLMs) failed to predict cell specific efficacy in OS cells while they were successful in KRAS mutation driven cells. Both SaOS-2 and K7M2 showed sensitivity to kinase inhibitors, particularly ponatinib, and we further explored their combinatorial therapeutic potential. We identified promising non-chemotherapeutic drug pairs, including trametinib-ponatinib and rapamycin-ganetespib and demonstrated potent synergistic effects. To mitigate dose limiting toxicities, drug pairs were formulated in polydopamine-stabilized nanoparticles and K7M2 murine models in vivo studies revealed that they preferably accumulated in tumors and were highly superior to the chemotherapeutic standard of care. Surprisingly, alternating administration of nanoparticle drug pairs was superior to concomitant regimen in both efficacy, survival and toxicity profiles. These findings strengthen a functional approach for combinatorial personalized treatment, potentially overcoming the limitations of current therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.