SynthesisGeroScience2026
Mortality, functional outcome, and bleeding risk after early versus delayed thrombectomy.
Synthesis in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is an established treatment for acute ischemic stroke, due to large vessel occlusion (LVO), but the optimal time window for intervention remains a subject of ongoing debate. We aimed to assess the impact of treatment timing on mortality, functional outcomes, and safety by comparing early (≤ 6 h) versus late (> 6-24 h) EVT. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of time to intervention on outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke. Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2024. Eligible randomized controlled trials and cohort studies reported on 90-day mortality, functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS), or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), stratified by treatment timing (≤ 6 h vs. > 6-24 h from symptom onset). Pooled incidence rates, incidence rate differences (IRD), and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated using random-effects models. Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was 0.19 events per person-year (95% CI: 0.12-0.26) in the early group and 0.23 events per person-year (95% CI: 0.11-0.35) in the late group, with no significant difference between groups (incidence rate difference [IRD] - 0.028; p = 0.33, incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.88; p = 0.33). For mortality, early EVT showed a significantly lower incidence rate of 0.66 events per person-year (95% CI: 0.51-0.82) compared to 0.77 events per person-year (95% CI: 0.63-0.91) in the late EVT group (IRD - 0.148; p = 0.0012, IRR 0.81; p = 0.0014). Functional independence was more frequent in the early group (1.72; 95% CI: 1.42-2.01) than in the late group (1.45; 95% CI: 0.91-1.98) (IRD 0.32; p < 0.0001, IRR 1.22; p < 0.0001). Heterogeneity was moderate to high across outcomes. The timing of endovascular thrombectomy significantly influences clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. Our analysis shows that early intervention (within 6 h) is associated with a significantly lower mortality rate and a higher likelihood of achieving functional independence at 90 days compared to late intervention (beyond 6 up to 24 h). The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the groups, suggesting that late treatment does not increase safety risks. These findings underscore the importance of minimizing treatment delays, while also supporting the continued use of EVT in selected patients beyond the 6-h window.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.