ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
The critical role of diagnostic accuracy in differentiating uterine dehiscence and placenta accreta spectrum to enhance neonatal outcomes in complex cesarean sections.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis study aims to analyze the key factors that contribute to adverse neonatal outcomes in complex cesarean sections with a high risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 454 records collected between January 2018 and December 2023 at a single tertiary hospital, Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya, East Java. The PAS diagnosis was confirmed intraoperatively. Clinical outcomes, including gestational age, birth weight, birth length, Apgar score at 5 min, NICU admission, and neonatal complications, were compared between the PAS and uterine dehiscence groups. Adverse neonatal outcome is defined as Apgar score of less than 7 in 5 min. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify factors associated with composite adverse neonatal outcomes.
resultsA total of 443 cases with high suspicion of PAS were included in the analysis, of which 383 were confirmed as PAS and the remaining as uterine scar dehiscence. Multivariable binary logistic regression revealed that preterm delivery was significantly associated with an increased risk of composite adverse neonatal outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.46–8.53; p< 0.001). Furthermore, emergency surgery was identified as a significant risk factor (aOR 2.37; 95% CI: 1.04–4.00; p= 0.001). When comparing PAS and uterine dehiscence cases, the latter group had significantly higher gestational age at delivery (p = 0.002), better 5-minute Apgar scores (p < 0.001), greater birth weight (p < 0.001), longer birth length (p = 0.047), shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001), and a lower incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (p = 0.010).
conclusionPreterm delivery and emergency delivery are primary risk factors contributing to composite adverse neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by high-risk PAS. Early detection, detailed prenatal planning, and targeted clinical management are essential strategies to reduce adverse neonatal outcomes in these high-risk cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.