Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41102817›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Measuring individual and community capacity factors in people with multimorbidity and exploring associations with health outcomes.

Marianne McCallum, Frances S Mair, Sara Macdonald, Mary Kathleen Hannah, Kathryn Skivington, Jim Lewsey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marianne McCallumGeneral Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. marianne.mccallum@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6664-2485
Frances S MairGeneral Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9780-1135
Sara MacdonaldGeneral Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5380-6943
Mary Kathleen HannahMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-0140
Kathryn SkivingtonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3571-1561
Jim LewseyHeath Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3811-8165

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CAF/19/5Chief Scientist Office SPHSU17Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2Medical Research Council MC_UU0022/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with multimorbidity work to manage their conditions (burden of treatment). Burden of Treatment Theory (BOTT) proposes poorer outcomes when this work outweighs capacity - an individual's ability to successfully undertake the work of self-management. Capacity is influenced by individual and community factors. This study aims to quantify individual and community capacity factors and explore associations, if any, with mortality and hospitalisation in people with multimorbidity.

methodsData source is as follows: West of Scotland Twenty-07 cohort (three age-based cohorts - 15, 35 and 55 years at baseline (wave 1), followed up with four additional waves over 20 years). Participants are as follows: people with ≥ 2 chronic conditions. Variables (e.g. car access/self-esteem/neighbourliness) mapped to underlying individual and community BOTT constructs. Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) informed analysis. Cox regression analysis using time-varying covariates explored mortality associations; multiple logistic regression explored hospitalisation associations. Both analyses were adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation (SED), alcohol, exercise, fruit/vegetable intake, BMI, smoking, marital status, number of long-term conditions and blood pressure. Exploratory analysis of potential moderating effect of SED was also undertaken.

resultsA total of 2249 people had multimorbidity across the five waves (mean age 51.5 (SD 11.6) at baseline and 61 (14.9) at wave 5; male 40.6% baseline, 41.1% wave 5; smokers 32.7% baseline, 25.3% wave 5). Living in social housing was associated with increased mortality (HR (95% CI) 1.39 (1.14, 1.68)), while registered disability was associated with increased risk of hospitalisation (OR (95% CI) 1.7 (1.27, 2.27)). Feeling fearful about walking in the dark was associated with mortality ("try to avoid" OR (95% CI) 0.74 (0.60, 0.92); "feel uncomfortable" (OR (95% CI) 0.70 (0.55, 0.89); "no worries" 0.69 (0.57, 0.83)). Feeling little control over one's life: disagreeing quite a bit with "care from others helps me to get well" OR (95% CI) 0.53 (0.33, 0.86). Initial exploratory analysis suggests high SED could act as a potential moderator, increasing associations between community factors with mortality and hospitalisations.

conclusionsIndividual and community factors influencing capacity to self-manage multimorbidity are quantifiable and associated with adverse health outcomes. Our work adds to the growing body of evidence that capacity issues may be important when designing future multimorbidity interventions and services.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityAdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedScotlandSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultBurden of Treatment TheoryCapacityMultimorbidityTreatment burden

Identifiers

PMID41102817
PMCPMC12532429

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.