ArticleNutrition & metabolism2025
Relationship between stress, diet, and gut microbiota: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Nutrition & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations Between Microbial Depletion and Autonomic Dysregulation in Binge-Eating Disorder.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Emerging Therapeutic Approaches for Modulating the Intestinal Microbiota.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Mindful eating and Chrono-Mediterranean diet adherence associated with lower gastrointestinal symptom burden in young adults.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe complex interaction of food habits, stress levels, and gut microbiota is instrumental in shaping global human well-being. Lifestyle indicators like diet, stress, and exercise have immense potential to drive gut health but are usually plagued by the divide between knowledge and action. METHODLOGY: This research compared lifestyle variables and awareness of gut health in 51 participants on a standardized questionnaire. It analyzed variables such as frequency of meals, intake of processed foods, intake of dietary fiber and probiotics, history of digestive diseases, perceived influence of stress, and knowledge of the gut-brain axis.
resultsResults indicated that 69.05% of the participants ate only 1-2 meals a day, and 71.43% had moderate consumption (1-2 times per week) of fast or processed foods. A concerning fact is that only 7.14% ate probiotic foods daily, and only 28.57% had high-fiber foods in their daily diet. Gastrointestinal problems were prevalent, with 56.41% having issues and 51.28% having occasional problems (1-2 times per week). In addition, 66.67% thought that stress influences their digestion, and 74.36% experienced changes in diet influencing their gut. Just 13.16% were physically active daily, and 44.74% slept for less than six hours daily, both are known to influence the gut microbiome. While 76.32% understood the diet-stress-microbiota connection, just 57.89% were of the view that dietary modifications can help manage stress.
conclusionThe research points to an important gap between knowledge and practical behaviors concerning gut health and stress management. There is a need for public health programs to enhance sustainable lifestyle and dietary changes to improve microbial diversity, digestive well-being, and mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.