Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103245›Full record

SynthesisBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026

The Impact of Non-Radical Hysterectomy on Urinary Functions: Evaluation of Symptoms-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Roberta Maria Arseni, Emanuele De Angelis, Ilaria Cuccu, Andrea Giannini, Giorgio Bogani, Francesco Plotti, Corrado Terranova, Roberto Angioli, Tommaso Simoncini, Giuseppe Vizzielli and 10 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Roberta Maria ArseniDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8808-9183
Emanuele De AngelisDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9930-2810
Ilaria CuccuDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Andrea GianniniUnit of Gynecology, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giorgio BoganiGynecological Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Francesco PlottiResearch Unit of Gynaecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Corrado TerranovaResearch Unit of Gynaecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Roberto AngioliResearch Unit of Gynaecology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Tommaso SimonciniDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology I, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giuseppe VizzielliClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Stefano RestainoClinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.
Jvan CasarinObstetrics and Gynecology Department, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9519-1097
Massimiliano FambriniDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Flavia SorbiDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Paolo ScolloDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", Enna, Italy.
Fulvio ZulloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Eliona DemaliajDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital "Queen Geraldine", Tirane, Albania.
Giorgia PerniolaDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Ludovico MuziiDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Violante Di DonatoDepartment of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimple hysterectomy is one of the most common gynaecological surgical procedures worldwide; however, its association as a possible aetiological factor for urinary dysfunction remains controversial.

objectiveTo evaluate the clinical impact of different types of non-radical hysterectomy on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). SEARCH STRATEGY: A structured search was conducted across scientific sources through December 1989 to March 2025, using terms including: 'urodynamics', 'urinary incontinence', 'stress incontinence', 'urge incontinence', 'urinary urgency', 'urinary frequency', 'urinary nocturia' and 'urinary retention', 'lower urinary tract symptoms', 'hysterectomy'. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and prospective observational studies assessing patients undergoing simple hysterectomy with pre- and post-operative evaluation by validated questionnaires. Exclusion criteria included case reports, reviews, editorials, short communications, radical hysterectomy, post-operative assessment only, non-English publications and studies on pelvic organ prolapse surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Ten studies, encompassing 1769 patients, were included in the analysis. Five outcomes were selected: changes in urinary frequency; occurrence of stress urinary incontinence; occurrence of urge urinary incontinence; changes in nocturia; changes in incomplete bladder emptying. MAIN

resultsChanges from baseline to last follow-up available in urinary frequency (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.36-0.66; p < 0.00001); stress urinary incontinence (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.44-0.68; p < 0.00001); urge urinary incontinence (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.94; p = 0.01); nocturia (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36-0.84; p = 0.005); incomplete bladder (OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.66-1.36; p = 0.77).

conclusionThe present meta-analysis suggests that simple hysterectomy is associated with a reduction in the prevalence of urinary symptoms postoperatively.

trial registrationPROSPERO: CRD42024575574.

Indexed as

HysterectomyLower Urinary Tract SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsFemaleHumansUrodynamicsnon‐radical hysterectomystress incontinenceurge incontinenceurinary incontinenceurodynamic disfunctionurodynamic tests

Identifiers

PMID41103245
PMCPMC12770083

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.