ArticleChemical senses2025
Differences in hedonic perception of retronasal odors between young children and adults.
Article in Chemical senses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of pediatric olfactory disorders: a review from etiology to management.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early childhood is a critical developmental period for the establishment of flavor preferences that in turn affect food and beverage consumption and health into adulthood. Flavor is a multisensory experience, combining taste and retronasal odor signals. However, while early life development of taste perception has received ample attention, there is limited knowledge of retronasal odor perception in early life. In the present cross-sectional study, we tested the hypothesis that hedonic perception of retronasal smell differs between children and adults. We used video analysis of facial expressions to taste and retronasal odor solutions in children and adults. Children ages 3 to 6 and one of their parents (n = 112 dyads) were asked to sample solutions containing either a taste or an odor compound. A subset of subjects (n = 84 dyads) also explicitly rated each solution on a pictorial liking scale. No differences between the 2 age groups were observed in responses to taste solutions. In contrast, responses to retronasal odor stimuli were less stimulus-specific in children compared with adults. Children showed fewer negative facial expressions to broccoli and pumpkin odors, and more negative facial expressions to apple and mango odors. Similar differences between the 2 age groups were observed in explicit hedonic ratings. These findings support our hypothesis that the hedonic value of retronasal odor components of flavor is not innate but differ between young children and adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.