Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103246›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2025

Differences in hedonic perception of retronasal odors between young children and adults.

Sarah E Colbert, Gaby de la Vega, Callie L Brown, Joost X Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah E ColbertDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6905-6107
Gaby de la VegaDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Callie L BrownDepartment of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem NC, United States.
Joost X MaierDepartment of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7528-8980

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Development of the multisensory computations underlying flavor processingR01DC020212 · NIDCD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Joost Maier · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Development of Retronasal Smell Perception in Young Children and Relation with BMIF31DC022149 · NIDCD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Sarah Elizabeth Colbert · 2024 to 2026
$149k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001420NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC022149NIDCD NIH HHS F31DC022149NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020212NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC020212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early childhood is a critical developmental period for the establishment of flavor preferences that in turn affect food and beverage consumption and health into adulthood. Flavor is a multisensory experience, combining taste and retronasal odor signals. However, while early life development of taste perception has received ample attention, there is limited knowledge of retronasal odor perception in early life. In the present cross-sectional study, we tested the hypothesis that hedonic perception of retronasal smell differs between children and adults. We used video analysis of facial expressions to taste and retronasal odor solutions in children and adults. Children ages 3 to 6 and one of their parents (n = 112 dyads) were asked to sample solutions containing either a taste or an odor compound. A subset of subjects (n = 84 dyads) also explicitly rated each solution on a pictorial liking scale. No differences between the 2 age groups were observed in responses to taste solutions. In contrast, responses to retronasal odor stimuli were less stimulus-specific in children compared with adults. Children showed fewer negative facial expressions to broccoli and pumpkin odors, and more negative facial expressions to apple and mango odors. Similar differences between the 2 age groups were observed in explicit hedonic ratings. These findings support our hypothesis that the hedonic value of retronasal odor components of flavor is not innate but differ between young children and adults.

Indexed as

OdorantsOlfactory PerceptionAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFacial ExpressionFemaleHumansMaleSmellTasteYoung Adultconsumptionearly childhoodfacial expressionflavorhedonicretronasal olfaction

Identifiers

PMID41103246
PMCPMC12596190

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.