SynthesisBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026
Interventions to Improve Outcomes After Pregnancy Loss: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy in a Cesarean Section Scar-Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStillbirth, second-trimester miscarriage and recurrent miscarriage carry significant consequences for women. We lack sufficient high-quality evidence of interventions to improve a woman's health and subsequent pregnancy outcomes after discharge to the community.
objectiveAssess the effectiveness of interventions to improve general health and subsequent pregnancy outcomes for non-pregnant women who have had a stillbirth, second trimester miscarriage, or recurrent miscarriage. SEARCH STRATEGY: Database searches were undertaken in August 2022 (updated March 2024) and limited to full-text documents published from 1995. SELECTION CRITERIA: Interventions delivered after discharge for non-pregnant women following a pregnancy loss. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Screening was performed independently by two reviewers; narrative synthesis was undertaken. Risk of bias was assessed by RoB-2, ROBINS-I or the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. MAIN
resultsA total of 18 603 abstracts screened; 196 full texts assessed and 15 papers included. The quality of evidence was low, and the primary aim of the review was not met due to limited evidence. All included studies aimed to improve mental health. No studies were identified that aimed to improve the physical health of women or subsequent pregnancy outcomes.
conclusionsThere is a significant evidence gap regarding how best to care for women who experience pregnancy loss after discharge to the community. There is an urgent need for research to determine which interventions are most effective to improve a woman's short- and long-term health and subsequent pregnancy outcomes following a stillbirth, second-trimester miscarriage or recurrent miscarriage.
trial registrationPROSPERO Registration: CRD42022360264.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.