ArticleInternational journal of endocrinology and metabolism2025
Uncovering the Hidden Connections Between PCOS and Alzheimer's Disease: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Perspective.
Article in International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Androgenetic alopecia in polycystic ovary syndrome: a cutaneous marker of systemic metabo-inflammatory and endocrine dysfunction.Endocrine connections · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) are two prevalent and complex conditions characterized by overlapping features such as metabolic dysfunction, hormonal imbalance, and chronic inflammation. These commonalities raise the possibility of a shared causal pathway. However, observational studies often face limitations due to confounding factors, complicating causal inference. Objectives: The present study aimed to explore the causal link between PCOS and AD through Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: We conducted a two-sample MR analysis using summary-level data from two large genome-wide association studies (GWAS). For the exposure, genetic variants strongly associated with PCOS were obtained from a GWAS meta-analysis involving 10,074 cases and 103,164 controls of European ancestry. For the outcome, AD data were sourced from a separate GWAS comprising 1,036,225 cases and 90,338 controls, also of European descent. Multiple MR approaches were employed, with inverse variance weighted (IVW) as the primary method, supported by MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode methods. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Results: The two-sample MR analysis did not provide evidence for a significant causal effect of genetically predicted PCOS on AD risk. The initial IVW analysis using all instrumental variables (IVs) yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 0.967 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.905 - 1.03; P = 0.311]. After removing outlier single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on sensitivity analyses, the refined IVW model showed an OR of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.866 - 1.002; P = 0.057), indicating no statistically significant association. The results were consistent across various MR methods, and sensitivity tests confirmed the robustness of the findings. Conclusions: This MR study found no evidence of a significant causal relationship between genetically predicted PCOS and AD. These findings suggest that genetic predisposition to PCOS does not increase the risk of AD, indicating that previously observed associations in epidemiological studies may not reflect a causal link. Further studies are needed to explore alternative explanations beyond genetic causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.