Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41103474›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Living during COVID-19: qualitative analysis of Experts by Experience UK University Associates' socioeconomic inequalities, including readiness recommendations.

Joy M Rooney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joy M RooneyIndependent Researcher, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vulnerable group of people with disabilities and carers (Experts by Experience) wished for research during the COVID-19 pandemic to assist other people with disabilities in the future. Consideration of this vulnerable group seems to be limited in future policy pandemic readiness despite huge potential mortality. Literature reviewed critical public health theory through assessing health inequalities and health equity in relation to disability/chronic ill health. A standard qualitative thematic method distinguished socioeconomic health inequalities for people with earlier mental/psychosocial distress and other Experts by Experience-including people with physical, visual, self-identified hidden disabilities, and their carers. Environmental, community, and individual challenge were part of the overarching theme. Up to five sub-themes were: shielding, diminished quality of life, use of social media vs. the digital divide, people with hidden disabilities, activism, celebrating lockdowns' ends, loss in stability of outlook, loneliness/isolation, coping strategies, developing new skills, re-evaluating lives because the world will change. Discussion of findings relied on four critical public health pillars; included were future recommendations for pandemic/emergency readiness.

Indexed as

CaregiversCOVID-19Health Status DisparitiesPersons with DisabilitiesAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMalePandemicsQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2Socioeconomic FactorsUnited KingdomUniversitiesCOVID-19critical public healthdisabilityequity in healthexperts by experiencehidden disabilitiessocioeconomical inequalities in healthvulnerable group

Identifiers

PMID41103474
PMCPMC12523057

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.