ArticleJHLT open2025
Specific risk factors for heart-lung transplantation.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart-lung transplantation (HLTx) has become increasingly rare, with fewer than 50 procedures performed annually worldwide. This decline reflects evolving indications, notably the predominance of Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) complicating congenital heart disease (CHD). HLTx remains a complex procedure associated with significant perioperative and long-term risks, particularly in this patient population. Methods: This review synthesizes current literature and registry data to identify specific risk factors associated with HLTx in its modern indications. It examines changes in patient selection, timing of listing, perioperative challenges, and postoperative outcomes, with a focus on ES and CHD-related cases. Results: HLTx candidates often present with prior thoracic surgeries, polycythemia, systemic arterial collaterals, and multi-organ dysfunction, all contributing to increased surgical complexity and bleeding risk. Long waitlist times and donor shortages further complicate management. Despite these challenges, recent data from expert centers show improved early survival, with 1-year survival rates exceeding 85%. HLTx may offer protective effects against chronic graft dysfunctions such as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and coronary artery vasculopathy compared to isolated organ transplants. Conclusions: HLTx remains the treatment of choice for select patients with complex cardiopulmonary disease, particularly ES with CHD. Optimizing outcomes requires early referral, careful risk stratification, and management in high-volume expert centers. Advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care have improved survival, but HLTx continues to demand multidisciplinary expertise and individualized patient assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.