ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Audiology practice in assessing and managing tinnitus: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Tinnitus may negatively impact quality of life, emphasizing the importance of effective management to support patients' well-being. This study aimed to gain insights into the current practices among audiologists in Saudi Arabia in assessing and managing tinnitus patients and to identify areas for improvement. Methods: A cross-sectional study surveyed 96 audiologists using an electronic questionnaire comprising 30 items and 5 demographic questions. The questionnaire covered appointment structure, tinnitus assessment and management, outcome measures, determinants of successful management, clinical skills, resource availability, and satisfaction with services. Results: Only 14.6% of workplaces had specialized tinnitus clinics, and appointment durations were generally short. Of the audiologists, 32.3% reported practicing multidisciplinary care, while group therapy was not used, and family involvement was acknowledged by less than half. Audiological tests were widely used for assessment, but psychoacoustic measures and validated questionnaires were uncommon. Management primarily relied on hearing aids and counseling, with limited use of psychological approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapy. Audiologists reported moderate satisfaction with their effectiveness in managing tinnitus (mean = 3.25 ± 0.98). Higher satisfaction was associated with working in specialized clinics, multidisciplinary teams, same-day assessment and treatment, and more trained audiologists available for counseling (all Conclusion: Tinnitus practice in Saudi Arabia revealed notable discrepancies in approaches taken by audiologists, primarily due to limited training and resources. Establishing evidence-based guidelines, expanding professional training, and improving resource allocation are needed to enhance the quality and consistency of tinnitus care, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.