ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2025
Promoting ethical and reproducible cell culture: implementing animal-free alternatives to teaching in molecular and cell biology.
Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell line identity rather than medium composition determines transcriptomic profiles of HepaRG and HuH7 cells cultured in chemically defined or serum-based media: comparison with primary human hepatocytes.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Exploring ethical, sustainable and effective foetal bovine serum alternatives forFrontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Establishment of human-relevantFrontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- Revisiting 3Rs: rethinking replacement and new approach methodologies.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread use of fetal bovine serum (FBS) and other animal-derived reagents in cell culture raises ethical concerns and scientific limitations, including batch variability and undefined composition. To address these challenges and promote the adoption of xeno-free, human-relevant methods, we developed a graduate-level laboratory course based on animal-free workflows. The curriculum covers key molecular and cell biology techniques: HeLa cell culture and passaging, transfection, RNA interference (RNAi), quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), dual-luciferase assays, and Western blotting, using reagents selected to exclude animal-derived components. A chemically defined medium (CDM) was optimized for robust HeLa cell growth in the absence of FBS, and recombinant TrypLE was implemented as a substitute for porcine trypsin. Validated non-animal-derived antibodies are also introduced. The course has been successfully piloted and provides a scalable, ethical framework for modern bioscience education. A detailed, open-access protocol enables replication and dissemination. This initiative equips students with practical skills and educational foundation in animal-free methodologies, supporting a shift toward reproducible and ethically responsible biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.