ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences
Fertility-sparing Management of Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumour of Uncertain Malignant Potential: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a case of a 35-year-old nulliparous woman diagnosed with a uterine smooth muscle tumour of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) following abdominal myomectomy. Histopathology revealed diffuse atypia, a low mitotic index and no tumour cell necrosis. Immunohistochemistry supported a low-risk profile. The patient wished to preserve fertility and, following multidisciplinary input, opted for conservative management of the uterus with structured imaging surveillance and underwent oocyte cryopreservation. This case underscores the importance of individualised fertility-sparing strategies in low-risk STUMP and the critical need for long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.