ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Motivational Interviewing to Promote Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors: Evidence, Implementation, and Digital Applications.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Motivational Interviewing in Health Behavior Change: Development and Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Supporting and Non-Stigmatizing Communication in the Process of Weight Change: The Role of Motivational Interviewing.Nutrients · 2026Review
- A Social Media Single Session Intervention Designed to Promote Healthier Social Media Use: Youth Focus Group Feedback.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Population-level evidence on lifestyle-related education and preventive services in primary care in Poland-a 2025 cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic lifestyle-related diseases, including poor diet, physical inactivity, and smoking, pose a global health challenge. Motivational Interviewing (MI), a client-centered approach, effectively promotes behavior change. This review examines MI's impact on healthy lifestyle behaviors and its implications for healthcare practice and research. Methodology: Relevant studies published between 2015 and 2025 were sourced from PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. Inclusion criteria focused on research evaluating the role of MI in promoting healthy behaviors, while studies unrelated to MI were excluded. The selected literature included diverse study designs assessing both the effectiveness and implementation of MI across various health domains. Results: The evidence shows that MI promotes short-term improvements in diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, and treatment adherence. It encourages healthier eating patterns, greater exercise participation, and higher abstinence rates, while also enhancing engagement in psychological therapies. However, effectiveness is highly dependent on practitioner fidelity and demographic tailoring, with outcomes varying by gender, age, and population needs. Despite promising initial results, long-term benefits often decline due to dropout, logistical challenges, and socioeconomic barriers. Digital and hybrid delivery models offer a potential solution, improving accessibility, scalability, and sustained adherence, and represent an important direction for future implementation. Conclusion: MI is a versatile, evidence-based tool for fostering healthy lifestyle behaviors. Its non-confrontational, autonomy-supportive approach aligns well with diverse clinical and public health contexts. Future research should prioritize scalable digital/hybrid models, strategies for sustained outcomes, and implementation science frameworks to address real-world barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.