Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104392›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in transplantation2025

Decision regret and long-term weight evolution following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as bridge to kidney transplantation.

Xin Yu Yang, Pamela Brazeau-Porrello, Roy Hajjar, David Badrudin, Radu Pescarus, Gabriel Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin Yu YangDivision of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Pamela Brazeau-PorrelloDivision of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Roy HajjarDivision of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
David BadrudinDivision of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Radu PescarusDivision of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Gabriel ChanDivision of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is effective for rapid weight loss in kidney transplant (KT) candidates. This study aims to evaluate satisfaction or regret with the decision to undergo LSG in preparation for KT and the long-term durability of this approach to weight loss. Methods: From 2012 to 2019, all patients who underwent LSG prior to waitlisting for KT were included. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) was assessed regarding the decision to undergo LSG before KT. The long-term weight evolution was also collected. Findings: Forty-six subjects completed the DRS survey at a median follow-up of 8 years post-LSG: 67% reported absolutely no regret, 22% mild regret, and 11% moderate to strong regret. Successful surgical weight loss was achieved in 36 patients and was significantly associated with lower levels of regret ( Conclusion: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a pre-transplantation weight loss strategy is associated with very low levels of regret, regardless of the KT status. LSG has demonstrated long-term, durable weight loss.

Indexed as

bariatric surgerydecision regretend-stage renal diseasekidney transplantlaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyobesity

Identifiers

PMID41104392
PMCPMC12521130

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.