Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41104621›Full record

ReviewCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Building Hybrid Pharmacometric-Machine Learning Models in Oncology Drug Development: Current State and Recommendations.

Anna Fochesato, Logan Brooks, Omid Bazgir, Philippe B Pierrillas, Candice Jamois, James Lu, Francois Mercier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna FochesatoTranslational PKPD and Clinical Pharmacology, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Logan BrooksClinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Omid BazgirClinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.
Philippe B PierrillasPredictive Modeling, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Candice JamoisTranslational PKPD and Clinical Pharmacology, Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
James LuClinical Pharmacology, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9687-5607
Francois MercierGenentech Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5685-1408

Funding

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classic and hybrid pharmacometric-machine learning models (hPMxML) are gaining momentum for applications in clinical drug development and precision medicine, especially within the oncology therapeutic area. However, standardized workflows are needed to ensure transparency, rigor, and effective communication for broader adoption. In this tutorial, we review pharmacometric (PMx) and machine learning (ML) reporting standards and evaluate them against hPMxML works in oncology contexts as a motivational example to identify current deficiencies and propose mitigation strategies for future efforts. The revealed gaps include insufficient benchmarking, absence of error propagation, feature stability assessments, and ablation studies, limited focus on external validation and final parametrization, and discrepancies between the performance metrics chosen and the original clinical questions. To address these, we propose a checklist for hPMxML model development and reporting, consisting of steps for estimand definition, data curation, covariate selection, hyperparameter tuning, convergence assessment, model explainability, diagnostics, uncertainty quantification, validation and verification with sensitivity analyses. This standardized approach is expected to enhance the reliability and reproducibility of hPMxML outputs, enabling their confident application in oncology clinical drug development, while fostering trust among all stakeholders.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug DevelopmentMachine LearningNeoplasmsHumansMedical OncologyPrecision MedicineReproducibility of ResultsAntineoplastic Agentsclinical drug developmentmachine learningpharmacometrics

Identifiers

PMID41104621
PMCPMC12823305

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.