ReviewHuman brain mapping2025
Review of Dynamic Resting-State Methods in Neuroimaging: Applications to Depression and Rumination.
Review in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ketamine's impact on rumination-related brain dynamics: insights from a randomized controlled fMRI trial.Translational psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Dynamic functional connectivity variability may explain hypoxia-induced cognitive impairment at high-altitude.iScience · 2026Article
- Dynamic coactivation patterns during repetitive negative thinking: A cross-sectional fMRI study.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Topological data analysis reveals rigid brain-state dynamics during self-viewing in trait rumination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Review of Dynamic Resting-State Methods in Neuroimaging: Applications to Depression and Rumination.Human brain mapping · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large-scale functional brain networks have most commonly been evaluated using static methods that assess patterns of activation or functional connectivity over an extended period. However, this approach does not capture time-varying features of functional networks, such as variability in functional connectivity or transient network states that form and dissolve over time. Addressing this gap, dynamic methods for analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data estimate time-varying properties of brain functioning. In the context of resting-state neuroimaging, dynamic methods can reveal spontaneously occurring network configurations and temporal properties of such networks. Patterns of network functioning over time during the resting state may be indicative of individual differences in cognitive-affective processes such as rumination, or the tendency to engage in a pattern of repetitive negative thinking. We first introduce the current landscape of dynamic methods and then review an emerging body of literature applying these methods to the study of rumination and depression to illustrate how dynamic methods may be used to study clinical and cognitive phenomena. An emerging body of research suggests that rumination is related to altered functional flexibility of brain networks that overlap with the canonical default mode network. An important future direction for dynamic fMRI analyses is to explore associations with more specific features of cognition.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.