ArticleGigaScience2025
PanGIA: A universal framework for identifying association between ncRNAs and diseases.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell type-specific dissection of cell death programs during ovarian aging.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- PanGIA: A universal framework for identifying association between ncRNAs and diseases.GigaScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the growing recognition of the important roles noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) play in various biological functions, especially their potential involvement in many human diseases, predicting ncRNA-disease associations has become a key challenge in biomedical research.
resultsAlthough many computational methods have been proposed to predict ncRNA-disease associations, most of these methods focus on a single type of ncRNA. However, the competitive and cooperative interactions among different types of ncRNAs are closely related to their functional roles in disease associations. To address this limitation, we propose a novel computational framework, PanGIA (Pan-ncRNA Graph-Interaction Attention network), designed to simultaneously predict potential associations between multiple types of noncoding RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), and diseases. Experimental results show that PanGIA outperforms type-specific SOTA methods in both individual and comprehensive predictions. It remains robust even when nodes or ncRNA types are removed, and ablation studies confirm the benefits of cross-type information. PanGIA also outperforms several single-type state-of-the-art methods across multiple metrics.
conclusionsPanGIA demonstrates significant advantages in predicting disease associations for different types of ncRNAs, including miRNAs, lncRNAs, circRNAs, and piRNAs. Case studies further confirm the accuracy of the model's predictions, as all high-confidence associations were supported by literature evidence. This demonstrates the model's strong biological interpretability and promising potential for practical applications. The successful application of PanGIA provides a new paradigm for exploring disease-associated ncRNAs, highlighting their immense potential in the field of biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.