ReviewClinical and experimental medicine2025
The discovery of Bevacizumab. An historical reappraisal.
Review in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Targeted Colorectal Cancer Therapies with Natural Products: Mechanistic Pathways.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 1997, the monoclonal antibody A4.6.1 was humanized to create Bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech), an antibody suitable for clinical trials. In February 2004, Bevacizumab was approved in a randomized double-blind phase III study in which was administered in combination with bolus IFL (irinotecan, 5FU, leucovorin) chemotherapy as first-line therapy for previous untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. In 2020, the EMA approved the first biosimilar of Bevacizumab for the treatment of multiple types of cancer. The administration of Bevacizumab became popular among ophthalmologists for different ocular diseases. However, in most cases of cancers, including breast, melanoma, pancreatic and prostate cancer, Bevacizumab failed to increase survival. Despite impressive performances in animal models, however, inhibitors are not performing nearly as well in humans. The limitations of applying Bevacizumab are attributed to drug resistance, metastasis promotion and reduced delivery of chemotherapeutic agents, resulting from the dramatic decrease in tumor vasculature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.