Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41105247›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

Systematic bibliometric and visualized analysis of global research trends, impact, emerging areas, and hotspots of artificial intelligence in personalized medicine.

Arwa M Al-Dekah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Arwa M Al-DekahDepartment of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Science and Arts, Jordan, University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan. amaldekah15@sci.just.edu.jo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3166-6034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have significantly impacted the field of medicine. An increasing amount of evidence supports their use in personalized medicine research. This trend necessitates a thorough review of the growing literature to assist researchers in understanding the subject. This study aims to comprehensively analyze and systematically chart the research trends, influence, emerging areas, and key hotspots related to AI and ML in personalized medicine literature. The bibliometric and visualized analysis was conducted systematically using the data taken from the Scopus database. Bibliometric indicators were assessed using Microsoft Excel 365, VOSviewer, and the Bibliometrix R package. A total of 3719 articles were identified, accumulating 88,351 citations with a 42.1% annual growth rate. The yearly publication findings reveal notable upward trends over the last 19 years, peaking in 2024. The USA led in publication volume (38.8%). Harvard Medical School was a top institution. Leading researchers in this field are Michael R. Kosorok (20 articles). Journal of Personalized Medicine ranks highest among articles (69 articles). The authors' keyword analysis identified "deep learning," "biomarkers," and "radiomics" as hot research topics. The field of personalized medicine is moving revolutionarily, with AI and ML solutions paving their way and resulting in more research collaboration globally and advancing methodologies at a rapid pace. This study offers a broad knowledge framework, emphasizing significant developments and future directions. The findings offer valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and funding bodies to support interdisciplinary collaborations and future innovation in AI-driven personalized healthcare.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBibliometricsBiomedical ResearchPrecision MedicineHumansMachine LearningArtificial intelligenceHealthcareMachine learningPersonalized medicinePrecision medicine

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.