ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Systematic bibliometric and visualized analysis of global research trends, impact, emerging areas, and hotspots of artificial intelligence in personalized medicine.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Global Genomic Resources: A Narrative Review of Implications for Precision Medicine.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- From algorithms to clinical execution: A cross-validated knowledge atlas of AI-enabled precision care (2015-2025).Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have significantly impacted the field of medicine. An increasing amount of evidence supports their use in personalized medicine research. This trend necessitates a thorough review of the growing literature to assist researchers in understanding the subject. This study aims to comprehensively analyze and systematically chart the research trends, influence, emerging areas, and key hotspots related to AI and ML in personalized medicine literature. The bibliometric and visualized analysis was conducted systematically using the data taken from the Scopus database. Bibliometric indicators were assessed using Microsoft Excel 365, VOSviewer, and the Bibliometrix R package. A total of 3719 articles were identified, accumulating 88,351 citations with a 42.1% annual growth rate. The yearly publication findings reveal notable upward trends over the last 19 years, peaking in 2024. The USA led in publication volume (38.8%). Harvard Medical School was a top institution. Leading researchers in this field are Michael R. Kosorok (20 articles). Journal of Personalized Medicine ranks highest among articles (69 articles). The authors' keyword analysis identified "deep learning," "biomarkers," and "radiomics" as hot research topics. The field of personalized medicine is moving revolutionarily, with AI and ML solutions paving their way and resulting in more research collaboration globally and advancing methodologies at a rapid pace. This study offers a broad knowledge framework, emphasizing significant developments and future directions. The findings offer valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and funding bodies to support interdisciplinary collaborations and future innovation in AI-driven personalized healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41105247What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.