ArticleClinical and translational allergy2025
Digital Innovation in Asthma Management in Italy: Results From the "Confronting Asthma Survey".
Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital Innovation in Asthma Management in Italy: Results From the "Confronting Asthma Survey".Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid digital transformation has significantly impacted healthcare, particularly through eHealth solutions that offer great potential for managing chronic respiratory conditions such as asthma. This study explores the impact, attitudes, and acceptance of digital technologies in asthma management in Italy.
methodsA structured 34-item survey, developed in two versions for patients and physicians, was administered independently and anonymously to adult asthma patients and to specialists in pulmonology and allergology. The questionnaires collected data on demographics, professional background, digital habits (for work and leisure), use of digital tools such as apps and smart inhalers, doctor-patient digital communication, familiarity with online health resources, and perceived barriers to digital adoption. Data were collected anonymously via REDCap, with oversight from the Severe Asthma Network in Italy (SANI).
resultsA total of 134 patients and 180 doctors participated. Findings revealed a predominantly positive attitude toward digital tools, with 85% of physicians and 74.4% of patients embracing a "digital mindset." Nevertheless, digital innovations remain underutilized in clinical practice. While 85.6% of patients reported regularly using digital tools in their daily lives, 91.5% stated that their doctors had never recommended apps or websites for asthma self-management. Digital solutions such as mobile apps, wearable spirometers, and telemedicine are recognized for their potential benefits-clinicians highlighted symptoms self-tracking (17.2%), improved adherence (22.7%), and enhanced clinical interventions (11.7%) as key advantages. However, adoption is hindered by concerns such as information technology (IT) compliance (62.5%), legal risks (11.5%), and skepticism about the reliability of remote data (40.6%). Furthermore, 59.9% of clinicians and 66.8% of patients recognized a knowledge gap regarding the potential benefits of smart inhalers and digital therapeutics in respiratory care.
conclusionThe study highlights a positive attitude toward digital tools in asthma management but reveals limited adoption in clinical practice. Key barriers include IT compliance concerns and knowledge gaps. Addressing these challenges through education and regulatory support could enhance digital integration, improving asthma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.