ArticleJAMA network open2025
A Genomic Sequencing Approach to Newborn Mass Screening and Its Opportunities.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management change following NGS diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity: The Australasian experience.Journal of human immunity · 2026Article
- Scaling up genomic newborn screening: implementation lessons from the BabyScreen+ study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Perspectives on genomic newborn screening studies: design, implementation, and outcomes.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Integrating the Genomic Revolution into Newborn Screening: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.Pediatric reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Editorial: Newborn screening for inborn errors of metabolism volume II.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has the potential to revolutionize newborn screening (NBS) by enabling the early identification of actionable genetic conditions not detectable by traditional methods. However, its integration into routine screening programs remains limited due to challenges related to feasibility, interpretation, and clinical impact. Objective: To investigate the acceptability and feasibility as well as the clinical implications of an NGS-based NBS program using DNA extracted from dried blood spots (DBSs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, nonpharmacological, interventional, single-center cohort study was proposed to parents whose newborns were delivered between October 1, 2023, and July 31, 2024, in a tertiary-level hospital in Turin, Italy, serving as a referral center for high-risk pregnancies. Newborns were consecutively selected at birth and enrolled after obtaining parental consent during the maternity stay. Exposures: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) using an in silico panel of 521 genes associated with pediatric-onset, actionable conditions. Only pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were reported. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was the technical feasibility of WES on DBSs. Secondary outcomes were establishment of a genomic sequencing database for rapid reanalysis if subsequent clinical indications arise and preliminary qualitative evaluation of selected example cases to explore the clinical implications of NGS-based NBS results to inform future implementation in routine care. Results: Of 4709 eligible newborns, 4067 (86.4%) were enrolled (2078 males [51.1%]; mean [SD] gestational age, 38.7 [1.9] weeks). Sequencing was successful in 4054 of newborns (99.7%). Of 4054 newborns analyzed, 542 (13.4%) screened positive. After orthogonal confirmation and family segregation studies, 568 actionable molecular diagnoses were retained, affecting 529 newborns (13.0%). During follow-up, 45 newborns underwent WES reanalysis due to clinical suspicion of a genetic disease, of whom 9 (20.0%) received a diagnosis not included in the initial screening panel. Conclusions and Relevance: Genomic NBS using WES from DBSs was technically feasible and allowed early identification of actionable genetic conditions. Integration of genomic methods into NBS, although ethical, logistical, and clinical challenges remain, is a logical step but requires adequate genetic counseling and long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.