ArticlePloS one2025
Children's preferences for features and designs of KN95-style respirators: A comparative study between Indonesia and Nepal.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air pollution is a global crisis, posing significant health risks to humans. Children are particularly vulnerable to the effects of particulate air pollution, and the use of respiratory protection could reduce their exposure. Certified, well-fitting respirators have been shown to effectively filter airborne particles and are increasingly available for children in non-occupational settings. However, their effectiveness relies on proper fit and consistent use. Understanding children's perspectives on wearing respiratory protection, specifically their preferences for different types and styles of respirators, is crucial. To explore these issues, 12 focus group discussions were conducted in January 2023 with 116 children aged 6-12 years living in Kathmandu, Nepal (N = 67) and Bandung, Indonesia (N = 49). Participants were recruited from public and private schools in each city using purposive sampling to ensure diversity in age, gender and socio-economic background. Focus groups were held in school settings and facilitated by local researchers in the children's native languages. Children were shown seven different respirators and asked questions about their preferred styles and features. Statistical analyses using Wilcoxon one-sample tests and ordinal regression showed the most popular types of respirators had ear-loops rather than head-straps and some features (e.g., patterned rather than plain masks) were more popular with certain groups (e.g., younger children). These results suggest that respirator manufacturers should ideally offer a variety of styles or designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.