ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2025
Revisiting the genotoxic syndrome: Why are we overlooking the ecological impacts of genotoxins on animal populations?
Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute exposure to high concentrations of polystyrene nanoparticles induces genotoxicity in Daphnia pulex.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer, neurodegeneration and other chronic diseases have been a primary focus for researchers studying the effects of genotoxins on human populations. However, when the scope shifts to non-human animals in natural environments, the impact of genotoxins extends beyond aging-related diseases. In ecological studies, DNA damage biomarkers (e.g., fragmentation of genetic material, micronuclei) in animal populations are often used to indicate "environmental quality", but usually with a focus on human health. For example, an increase in the micronuclei frequency in an animal (sentinel) population may indicate risks to the genomic stability of the human population living in the same environment. This human-oriented approach frequently overlooks the ecological impacts of genotoxins on animal populations as an end, limiting the benefits for nature conservation from geno-toxicological studies. Environmental genotoxins pose a significant threat to biodiversity by causing multiple classes of DNA damage and mutations that impair varied cellular functions and reproduction, ultimately jeopardizing species survival through non-carcinogenic processes. This phenomenon, termed "genotoxic syndrome", will be revisited in this article with examples of its detrimental effects on non-human animal populations. Finally, challenges and opportunities in evaluating genotoxic syndrome and its importance for conservation strategies are also discussed.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.