ArticleScientific reports2025
Improved non-invasive detection of sleep stages when combining skin sympathetic nerve activity and heart rate variability analysis with AI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep is a cyclic physiological process that goes into different stages, and every stage has its' importance in the construction or recovery of physiological function. Sleep scoring is performed from polysomnography recordings which requires signals from multiple sensors in a specially equipped Sleep Lab. This is expensive, and normal sleep behavior may be affected due to the new environment and extensive testing equipment. Skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) has been shown to vary between sleep stages, and it can be recorded simultaneously with the ECG on the skin using conventional ECG patch electrodes. In this study, we propose that sleep stages can be classified using features derived from the ECG and SKNA recordings. The study was performed on 21 subjects, and we initially extracted 14 heart rate variability (HRV) and 11 SKNA features, and then selected the 17 most relevant (12 HRV, 5 SKNA) features out of 25. We evaluated both individual and combined performance of HRV and SKNA for classification of 5 sleep stages, 3 stages and binary stages. Our study showed that the addition of SKNA information with HRV provides an improved recognition accuracy of 91.57%, 95.36%, and 96.14%, respectively for 5, 3, and binary sleep stages. The SKNA shows similar performance to the HRV for 2 and 3 sleep stages recognition. This AI-powered sleep classification system might provide an advancement in the development of a real-time sleep monitoring device with low computing power that can be used for screening sleep disorders in a large population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.