ArticleScientific reports2025
Periodontal markers predict glycemic control in diabetic patients a ten year retrospective analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The synergistic and detrimental interplay between diabetes mellitus and periodontitis poses a significant health burden. This study aimed to rigorously evaluate the association between routinely documented clinical periodontal parameters and glycemic control (as measured by HbA1c) in a cohort of diabetic patients attending Al-Kufa University College of Dentistry over a decade. A further objective was to develop and internally validate a multivariable predictive model for estimating HbA1c based on these readily accessible markers. A retrospective cohort study design was employed, analyzing patient records from January 2014 to December 2023. Diabetic patients were identified through documented clinical diagnosis in medical records, not solely based on HbA1c values. The inclusion criteria targeted diabetic patients (Type 1 or 2) aged 18 years or older with at least one comprehensive periodontal examination and a corresponding HbA1c value (within ± 3 months). Both periodontal parameters and HbA1c values were extracted from records at the same time point within this timeframe. Data on demographics, smoking status, HbA1c levels, and detailed periodontal parameters were meticulously extracted. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, and multivariable linear regression, considering alternative variable selection methods to construct the HbA1c predictive model. The dataset was split for internal validation (70% training, 30% testing). Out of 987 screened records, 350 diabetic patient records were analysed (mean age 54.2 ± 10.5 years; mean HbA1c 8.1% ± 1.8%). HbA1c significantly correlated (p < 0.001) with BOP% (r = 0.35), percentage of sites with PD ≥ 5 mm (r = 0.38), and number of missing teeth (r = 0.30). A multivariable regression model including these periodontal markers, age, and smoking status explained 27.5% of HbA1c variance (Adjusted R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.