Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41107666›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2026

Navigating the Prognosis and Functional Recovery of Short Bowel Syndrome: A Mentored Review.

Yasmeen Saker, Amir Y Kamel, Abdillahi Ahmed, Steve Shen, Mark Radetic, Anil Sharma

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yasmeen SakerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Amir Y KamelDepartment of Pharmacy, Nutrition Support/Critical Care Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32608, USA. amir.kamel@ufhealth.org.
Abdillahi AhmedDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Steve ShenDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Mark RadeticDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Anil SharmaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a debilitating condition resulting from extensive small bowel resection, leading to profound malabsorption, malnutrition, and complications due to reduced absorptive capacity. The remaining intestine undergoes a complex process of intestinal adaptation, characterized by varying degrees of adaptive changes among individuals. While some patients regain oral autonomy, others will go on to develop chronic intestinal failure, necessitating long-term dependence on parenteral nutrition. This review outlines the different phases of intestinal adaptation-acute, adaptation, and maintenance-and current evidence-based interventions at each stage. This article also highlights prognostic factors that influence bowel recovery. Emerging biomarkers, including citrulline, apoprotein A-IV, and glucagon-like peptide 2, are evaluated for their potential in guiding treatment decisions and monitoring intestinal adaptation. These novel biomarkers offer promising avenues for improving patient management and prognosis in SBS.

Indexed as

Intestine, SmallShort Bowel SyndromeAdaptation, PhysiologicalBiomarkersHumansPrognosisRecovery of FunctionBiomarkersBiomarkersEnteral nutritionIntestinal failureMalabsorptionParenteral nutritionShort bowel syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41107666

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.