ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
Deep learning based retinal hard exudates quantification of optical coherence tomography.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long term evolutions of hard exudates after anti-VEGF therapy for diabetic macular oedema.Eye (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Hard exudates in diabetic macular edema after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy: a post-hoc analysis of the DRCR protocol T trial.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a deep learning (DL) model for segmenting retinal hard exudates (HE) from optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans.
methodsA modified U-Net architecture was trained on manually segmented OCT B-scans of retinal HE. The training set included 1,811 OCT scans from 15 patients with diabetic retinopathy or branch retinal vein occlusion. The model was evaluated using Dice coefficient and accuracy in idependant test set, and its HE area and volume predictions were compared to manually measured HE areas from a previous clinical study. Additionally, a 2D projected image was generated from the 3D structure of the predicted HE.
resultsThe DL model achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.721 and an accuracy of 99.9% on the test set. There was a moderate correlation between model-predicted HE volume and area and manually measured HE area from fundus photographs (R = 0.589 and 0.618, respectively; both P < 0.001). The projected 2D image generated from the model accurately visualized HE details, demonstrating better structural information compared to fundus photographs.
conclusionThe proposed DL model enables accurate segmentation of retinal HE, offering volumetric data with both horizontal and vertical structural information, which enhances visualization and quantification compared to traditional 2D imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.