Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41108178›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Investigating the Acceptability and Feasibility of Three Online Interventions for Caregivers of Infants with Feeding Difficulties.

Leanne Jackson, Ruth Drury, Giovanni Paolo Azzaro, Eduardo Coutinho, Leonardo De Pascalis, Vicky Charnock, Sian M Davies, Clare Jones, Helen McIlroy, Sharon Remmington and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Leanne JacksonUniversity of Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4491-1802
Ruth DruryUniversity of Liverpool, UK.
Giovanni Paolo AzzaroUniversity of Liverpool, UK.
Eduardo CoutinhoUniversity of Liverpool, UK.
Leonardo De PascalisUniversity of Liverpool, UK.
Vicky CharnockAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Sian M DaviesUniversity of Liverpool, UK.
Clare JonesAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Helen McIlroyAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Sharon RemmingtonAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Hannah SloanMaternity Voices Partnership, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Melanie ThomasAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Francine VerhoeffAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Victoria FallonUniversity of Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7350-2568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colic, Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux (Disorder; GOR[D]) and Cow's Milk Protein Allergy (CMPA) are common infantile afflictions in the first 6 months of life. These conditions are associated with high levels of infant irritability, prescription costs, and poor caregiver wellbeing. For other perinatal mental health concerns, for example, postpartum depression, peer support, music, and health education have been identified as effective interventions for nurturing caregiver wellbeing. However, these interventions have yet to be piloted in an online delivery format, among caregivers of infants diagnosed with colic, GOR(D), and CMPA. The current study aimed to determine the acceptability and feasibility of a non-clinical peer support, health education, and music intervention to caregivers of infants with colic, GOR(D), and CMPA, when compared with treatment as usual. Eligible caregivers were recruited during routine appointments with the infant feeding team at Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust. Consenting caregivers were assigned to 1 of the 4 intervention arms. For peer support only, a WhatsApp group accompanied group sessions. Intervention weeks 1-3 involved a one-hour online group session, where skills were developed with an aim to improve management of infantile symptoms, and to nurture self-care practices. In weeks 4-6, participants were encouraged to use skills obtained from weeks 1-3, independently. In week 7, evaluative focus groups were conducted. WhatsApp group data underwent conversational analysis and evaluative focus group data underwent thematic analysis. Feasibility was not achieved due to recruitment difficulties. However, the peer support intervention was deemed acceptable by mothers and staff. Peer support participants valued the flexibility of access to support via WhatsApp with other mothers with shared life experience. Evaluative focus groups identified study strengths and limitations which will provide insight to digital health researchers seeking to develop interventional research for caregivers of infants afflicted with colic, GOR(D), and/or CMPA.

Indexed as

CaregiversMilk HypersensitivityAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth EducationHumansInfantMalePeer GroupSocial Supportcaregiverscolicgastroesophageal refluxmaternal healthmilk hypersensitivitypilot projectsself-care

Identifiers

PMID41108178
PMCPMC12547111

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.