Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41108436›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2026

Application value and performance of stool antigen detection in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Xiaojuan Kang, Lingzhu Gou, Xinglan Chen, Yuanyuan Wang, Yali Liu, Dekui Zhang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fecal miR-146a as a Non-Invasive Biomarker forLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaojuan KangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Lingzhu GouDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Xinglan ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yuanyuan WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yali LiuCuiying Biomedical Research Center, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China. wo_lyl@163.com.
Dekui ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China. zhangdk8616@126.com.

Funding

Major Projects of the Joint Scientific Research Fund of Gansu Province 23JRRA1501Special Funding for Open and Shared Large-Scale Instruments and Equipment of Lanzhou University LZU-GXJJ-2025-003the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu 25JRRA625the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China 24ZDFA006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHelicobacter pylori infection is associated with various digestive disorders, including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric cancer, posing significant risks to human health. Effective and timely detection of H. pylori is crucial for early intervention and prevention. This review aims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of stool antigen detection and assess its clinical application value.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive review of the literature focusing on studies that compared invasive and non-invasive diagnostic methods for H. pylori, with an emphasis on stool antigen tests. Data on diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, advantages, and limitations, were synthesized from recent clinical evaluations and meta-analyses.

resultsStool antigen detection demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity and specificity often exceeding 90%, particularly when monoclonal antibody-based tests are used. It offers a non-invasive, cost-effective alternative to urea breath tests and is applicable across diverse populations, including children and the elderly. However, factors such as sample handling, antigen stability, and bacterial load can influence results.

conclusionStool antigen testing is a reliable tool for the initial diagnosis and post-treatment monitoring of H. pylori infection. Its high performance and practicality support its use in clinical practice, especially in settings where endoscopy or breath testing is less feasible. Further standardization and technological advances may enhance its utility in global screening programs.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialFecesHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, BacterialHelicobacter pyloriSensitivitySpecificityStool antigen detectionTraditional detection

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.